A phony picture overwhelmed the online life when somebody posted a screen capture of the HEC site referencing that HEC has dropped all college tests. Eduvision group broke down the picture and was the first to report that the picture is phony. A definite post can be found here. HEC site was down because of burden issues. Numerous understudies were visiting the HEC site and its server couldn't bear the weight of solicitations being made to get to the site information.
Yet, presently it is likewise being accepted that the HEC site was hacked. A TV channel likewise broke the updates on the HEC site being hacked. Understudies are ridiculing HEC that they can't make sure about their own site and are valuing the "Programmer". In any case, was it truly HACKED? The appropriate response is no.
Somebody who took a screen capture rolled out a couple of improvements on the downloaded page of the HEC site. There was no adjustment in the online form of the page; consequently it can't really be viewed as a HACKED site. In specialized terms, a site is hacked just when somebody gains admittance to the online server of a site, or an online rendition of any page of the site. In any case, for this situation, changes were appeared to be made on the downloaded variant of the page.
To comprehend what truly occurred, how about we accept that you download an image or a Word record from a site. At the point when it is downloaded to your PC, you can roll out any improvements to it. Right. Is this hacking? Certainly not. The equivalent is the situation with the HTML rendition of a page. At the point when you type a web address of a page, the solicitation is sent to the server, the server renders the necessary page to your program and when it is shown, the page is completely downloaded on your neighborhood PC.
Presently you can roll out any improvements to the pages, change its content, shading, picture, or anything you desire. However, changes remain on your PC, not on the online variant of the page. That is the thing that the supposed "Programmer" did, and by changing the code on his/her own PC he/she needed to snap a photo of the page to demonstrate it to other people. This can't be viewed as HACKING the site.
0 Comments